SKOPJE’S AWARD FOR ITS RACIST BEHAVIOR AND THE TREATY OF ST. GERMAIN-EN LAYE OF 1919: EU APPLICATION OF DOUBLE STANDARDS ON THE NAME ISSUE
Marcus A. Templar, MA, MSc
(Instructor of Public Policy and Counter-Terrorism)
Copyright: Marcus A. Templar on line
In Business Law, the principle nemo dat quod non habet means that no one may give what one does not have; nevertheless, this principle goes a little further. This rule stays valid regarding stolen goods, even if the bona fide purchaser does not know that the seller has no right to claim ownership of the object of the transaction. Thus if goods are stolen, the buyer does not get ownership even if there was no indication that they were stolen. Accordingly, the consequence of the above principle is that a person who does not own property, that is a thief, may not confer the stolen property to another person except with the true owner’s permission. The same applies in International Law.
Some six years after a Greek anti-terrorism tribunal convicted 15 operatives of the deadly November 17 terrorist group the case is far from closed. Key questions remain unanswered while a handful of operatives and collaborators who played a vital role in identifying high value targets for one of Europe’s deadliest terrorist groups remain at large.
Ioannis Michelis
Stefania Ducci